Avoid costly disputes – regulate jurisdiction clauses in your international agreements
When Swedish companies enter into agreements with foreign parties, it's easy to focus on the deal – but what happens if a dispute arises? Without clear rules about which country's courts (or whether it should be an arbitral tribunal) should handle potential disputes, and which law should apply, you risk a costly and protracted process in an unfamiliar legal system. Here, Lindahl's experts review the importance of jurisdiction clauses and provide a real-life example.
Why jurisdiction clauses are important
If your agreement lacks regulation of competent forum, the question is determined according to complex rules on private international law. The result may be that the process is delayed and that your Swedish company is forced to litigate abroad – with increased costs, practical difficulties and, in the worst case, a legally uncertain trial.
A real example
Lindahl recently represented a Swedish company in a protracted process against a foreign counterparty. The foreign company claimed that the Swedish court did not have jurisdiction and requested that the action be dismissed. The courts then had to interpret the meaning of a disputed contractual term, where the parties had different views on whether it constituted an agreement on court jurisdiction. We successfully assisted the Swedish company, which was granted the right by all legal instances to have its case tried by a Swedish court.
Three things to consider:
Predictability creates security
Without an agreement on competent forum, courts in several countries may have jurisdiction. A well-drafted jurisdiction clause clarifies both which country's court should try disputes and which law should apply.
The regulatory frameworks are complex
Many factors affect which court will have jurisdiction. Agreeing on this in advance eliminates uncertainty and gives you control over the process.
Avoid delays
Objections regarding court jurisdiction can delay a process considerably. The court must first examine its own jurisdiction before the substantive examination can begin – a clear clause reduces the risk of such procedural disputes.
Does your company have cross-border agreements?
Lindahl has extensive experience of international disputes and can help you secure your agreements. Contact our experts in dispute resolution for advice on private international law.
Want to know more?
Contact Lindahl’s experts for advice on dispute resolution and international agreements.
Carousel items
-
Cases and transactions
9/25/2026
Lindahl represented Trelleborgs Hamn in a new success against Rover Maritime
Lindahl again represented Trelleborgs Hamn against Rover Maritime, winning full success in the Stockholm District Court on its claim of over SEK 29 million plus interest, relating to the ferry berth 13 and 14 project.
-
Knowledge
9/21/2026
Adaptive capacity – four capabilities for organisations in change
Anna Engqvist, Chief Compliance & Sustainability Officer at Lindahl, discusses adaptive capacity – how organisations, employees, tools and leadership must work together to meet change proactively. Read about the four capabilities.
-
News articles
9/4/2026
Mikael Wärnsby represents Sweden at international conference on new nuclear power
Mikael Wärnsby represented Sweden at EFELA’s international conference on licensing and regulatory frameworks for new nuclear power in Europe.
-
Portraits
7/3/2026
Jesper on business-oriented legal advice in energy: "It is not enough for the advice to be correct"
Lindahl's energy team is recognised in Legal 500 for combining deep regulatory expertise with broad commercial legal experience – find out how they support clients in a rapidly evolving sector.
-
Read more news and insights?