Lindahl legal advisor to K2A Knaust & Andersson Fastigheter in its acquisition of a property located close to the university of Växjö
K2A has acquired the property Växjö Slottsstaden 4 which is located close to the university of Växjö. The property, built in 2005, includes two buildings of a total of 113 apartments to students and other rental purposes.
K2A is a property company which owns, develop and on a long term basis operates rental and social properties. The company’s common and preference shares are listed on Nasdaq Stockholm respectively.
Advokatfirman Lindahl has acted as legal adviser to K2A. From Lindahl participated Fredrik Heldqvist (project manager), Jesper Fredriksson, Alfred Åkesson and Sten Gejrot (partner).
Do you want to know more? Contact:
Jesper Fredriksson
Senior Associate | AdvokatSten Gejrot
PartnerCarousel items
-
Cases and transactions
9/15/2025
Lindahl advises Hines on the acquisition of eight industrial properties
Lindahl has advised Hines and its fund, Hines European Core Fund (HECF), on the acquisition of a portfolio of eight industrial properties in the Stockholm and Gothenburg regions.
-
Knowledge
9/8/2025
How the CJEU ruling affects your handling of pseudonymised data
A new ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union clarifies what constitutes personal data and clarifies the conditions under which companies can use pseudonymised data. Here's what you need to know - and what new opportunities it could o...
-
Portraits
8/19/2025
From demand letters to culture – Josefin on life as a summer trainee
Getting a real feel for what it's like to work as a lawyer was Josefin Mannevik's goal when she joined Lindahl's Gothenburg office as a summer trainee. A few weeks later, she has not only immersed herself in bankruptcy law, legal monitoring and si...
-
News articles
8/18/2025
Lindahl wins in the Supreme Court - bankruptcy cancelled for debt-free company
Lindahl has successfully represented ParkingSolar Nordic AB in a bankruptcy dispute that was decided in the company's favour by the Supreme Court. The case raises important questions about when presumption rules for insolvency can be applied.
-
