Avoid costly disputes – regulate jurisdiction clauses in your international agreements
When Swedish companies enter into agreements with foreign parties, it's easy to focus on the deal – but what happens if a dispute arises? Without clear rules about which country's courts (or whether it should be an arbitral tribunal) should handle potential disputes, and which law should apply, you risk a costly and protracted process in an unfamiliar legal system. Here, Lindahl's experts review the importance of jurisdiction clauses and provide a real-life example.
Why jurisdiction clauses are important
If your agreement lacks regulation of competent forum, the question is determined according to complex rules on private international law. The result may be that the process is delayed and that your Swedish company is forced to litigate abroad – with increased costs, practical difficulties and, in the worst case, a legally uncertain trial.
A real example
Lindahl recently represented a Swedish company in a protracted process against a foreign counterparty. The foreign company claimed that the Swedish court did not have jurisdiction and requested that the action be dismissed. The courts then had to interpret the meaning of a disputed contractual term, where the parties had different views on whether it constituted an agreement on court jurisdiction. We successfully assisted the Swedish company, which was granted the right by all legal instances to have its case tried by a Swedish court.
Three things to consider:
Predictability creates security
Without an agreement on competent forum, courts in several countries may have jurisdiction. A well-drafted jurisdiction clause clarifies both which country's court should try disputes and which law should apply.
The regulatory frameworks are complex
Many factors affect which court will have jurisdiction. Agreeing on this in advance eliminates uncertainty and gives you control over the process.
Avoid delays
Objections regarding court jurisdiction can delay a process considerably. The court must first examine its own jurisdiction before the substantive examination can begin – a clear clause reduces the risk of such procedural disputes.
Does your company have cross-border agreements?
Lindahl has extensive experience of international disputes and can help you secure your agreements. Contact our experts in dispute resolution for advice on private international law.
Want to know more?
Contact Lindahl’s experts for advice on dispute resolution and international agreements.
Carousel items
-
Cases and transactions
2/24/2026
Lindahl advises Medivir in directed share issue of SEK 45 million
Lindahl has acted as legal adviser to Medivir AB (publ) in connection with the company's directed share issue of SEK 45 million to Carl Bennet AB. The issue was carried out at a premium of 19 per cent to the closing price and has been well receive...
-
Knowledge
2/20/2026
Ambiguities and contradictions in construction contracts
Lindahl's construction law webinar addressed the interpretation of unclear contractual provisions, ranking in the event of conflicting contract documents and adjustment of delay penalties. The article summarises practical advice and recent case la...
-
News articles
2/12/2026
Lindahl ranked in Chambers and Partners Global Guide 2026
Lindahl is proud to once again be ranked in Chambers and Partners Global Guide. This year's ranking confirms the firm's strong position within several business-critical practice areas.
-
Portraits
1/20/2026
How I use AI in my daily work as a lawyer
AI is no longer the future – it is everyday reality. Johanna Karlsson, lawyer and senior associate at Lindahl, talks about how AI tools such as Legora have become a natural part of her workflow.
-
Read more news and insights?