• About us
    • About Lindahl
    • How we work
    • Said about Lindahl
    • Press
    • Find us
    • Privacy
  • Areas
    • Commercial dispute resolution
    • IT/Tech
    • Intellectual property
    • Life Sciences
    • M&A
    • All areas
  • Our people
    • Stockholm
    • Göteborg
    • Malmö
    • Uppsala
    • Helsingborg
    • Örebro
  • Latest news
    • Cases and transactions
    • News
    • Events
    • Knowledge
    • Portraits
  • Offices
    • Stockholm
    • Göteborg
    • Malmö
    • Uppsala
    • Örebro
    • Helsingborg

Arla Foods AB loses against the Consumer Ombudsman

  • Home
  • Latest news
  • Knowledge
  • 2023
  • Arla Foods AB loses against the Consumer Ombudsman

In a noted case between the Consumer Ombudsman and Arla Foods AB (the Patent and Market Court's judgement of 2 February 2022 in case no. PMT 17372-21), the Patent and Market Court considered that the use of the statement ”net-zero climate impact” on milk cartons was misleading and gave the impression that the dairy products did not produce any climate impact at all.


Arla had used the expression on the milk cartons throughout its Arla Ko Eko range. The Consumer Ombudsman claimed in the case that the marketing was misleading and in contravention of good marketing practice. The Patent and Market Court shared the Consumer Ombudsman's opinion and observed, among other things, that the average consumer cannot be expected to understand that the promised effect – ”net-zero climate impact” – was achieved using carbon offsetting activities that would not be able to compensate for the climate impact to which the milk production gave rise for 100 years after the emissions had taken place.

According to the Patent and Market Court, a cursory reading would not enable the average consumer to interpret the statement in any other way than that the relevant product does not affect the climate at all or at any rate that the climate impact that the product causes has been fully compensated. Further, the Patent and Market Court observed that it is not possible to draw any certain conclusions that the results will actually be achieved after 100 years. To sum up, Arla therefore did not succeed in adequately demonstrating that its marketing was valid.

According to the Marketing Act, a business must not utilise inaccurate statements or other representations in its marketing that are misleading in relation to the business's activities. It applies to specific representations that concern the product's quality and other distinctive features, as well as the product's use and risks such as the impact on health and the environment. Those who market a product or a service must be able to prove that the statements made in the marketing are valid, truthful, correct and clear.

 


CONCLUSIONS

The Patent and Market Court's judgement illustrates the challenges in correctly formulating the marketing of environmental benefits, and that it can be particularly difficult to clearly present the climate impact for a particular product. A reference to, for example, ”climate neutrality” or ”net zero climate impact” through so-called emissions trading can be misleading if the effects only arise after a long time and this is not presented clearly.

In this article (in Swedish), Lindahl has summarised some general advice that is worth taking into account if you are considering utilising environmental statements in your marketing.

Do not hesitate to contact our experts within marketing law in connection with more specific issues and for help with review and advice surrounding your marketing.

Intellectual property

Lindahl is one of Sweden’s leading legal advisors on intellectual property law and is highly ranked by international ranking institutions. Our experts offer high-quality advice in the field of intellectual property law.

Visit page

Related

  • 1/19/2023 4:12:48 PM The CSDD directive – another proposal from the EU that tightens the requirements for companies' sustainability management
  • 11/2/2022 10:30:24 AM Update on the European Commission’s proposal for an Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation
  • 1/17/2022 6:05:13 PM The Supreme Court accepts protection for trade names, despite another person’s specifically-protected surname

Contact

  • Felicia Åberg

    Malmö

    [email protected] +46 723 571 456
  • Johan Norderyd

    Malmö

    [email protected] +46 704 326 656
Pages
  • Start
  • About us
  • Areas
  • Our people
  • Latest news
  • Privacy
Our offices
  • Stockholm [email protected] +46 8 527 70 800
  • Göteborg [email protected] +46 31 799 10 00
  • Malmö [email protected] +46 40 664 66 50
  • Uppsala [email protected] +46 18 16 18 50
  • Örebro [email protected] +46 19 20 89 00
  • Helsingborg [email protected] +46 42 17 53 00
Social media
  • Connect with us on social networks: Instagram, Linkedin, Youtube, Facebook,

Disclaimer

The material and information on this site is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice on any specific matter. Please note that all images on Lindahl's website, www.lindahl.se, are subject to intellectual property protection and downloading, publication, copying and/or other use of the images requires the written consent of the rights holder. You'll find Advokatfirman Lindahl KB's general terms and conditions here.

Some cookies are essential, others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is used. For more information, please visit our Cookie Policy.

Essential Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the functionality of the site and cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies>

We use Analytics cookies to collect information that gives us insight into how our website is being used. We anonymize IP addresses in Google Analytics. By clicking on Decline we won't save theese cookies.

Decline
We use cookies to get insights on how our site is used and give our visitors the best possible experience